I'm almost done with a great book from the 33 1/3 book series. This is a series for serious music nerds. Each book is written on a "classic" album; it's either an in-depth account of the record, or a creative piece inspired by it. The unique aspect of the book I'm reading is that it's the only entry in the series that is dedicated to an album that the author totally hates. The book is called Let's Talk About Love: A Journey to the End of Taste, and the thing that makes it so great is that he puts his (and our) taste on trial. How much of taste is actually aesthetic taste, and how much of it is conforming to, or, at least in our minds, subverting the taste of "the herd"? He talks about philosophy, economics, Dion's place in Canada's psyche, and how taste often comes down to distinction: a way of distinguishing yourself from people that you consider to be beneath (or above) you.
If I'm honest with myself, I would say that I'm definitely a "snob" when it comes to music, books, film, etc. But what does that mean? I know that when I listen to certain music it moves me to a much greater extent than other music, but how much of my taste is at least to a certain extent dictated by my wanting to distinguish myself from others? For instance, why do I hate Train so much? The fact that they sound uninspired, premeditated, disingenuous, and capable of effectively substituting for Valium has to be part of it, but why is the feeling so visceral? I MUST BE GETTING SOMETHING OUT OF THAT HATE. I need some musical therapy, obviously.
This first video might be Celine at her worst. This performance wasn't even mentioned in the book, but it was branded in my mind like a mass slaughter of Teddy Ruxpin dolls witnessed by an overly sentimental five-year-old. It's. Just. SO BAD. I blame it more on the people who told her that this would be a cool thing to do than on her. But still! The dichotomy that is Dione is perfectly illustrated by the likes and dislikes: a very high number that is split almost perfectly down the middle. Even the top two comments are defensive reactions to the inevitable vitriol that is spewed in the comments below.
The Cults are viewed by some as a "guilty pleasure" (a concept which is also discussed in this book). I wouldn't go so far as to label them that. They actually do a really good job of emulating 60s girl groups. My only issue is that in the live clips I've seen, the lead singer uses effects on her vocals, instead of trying to approximate the studio versions with the creative use of background singers. Not a huge complaint, because her voice is still pretty good.
The "Go Outside" video is actually a bit creepy. Superimposing yourself into Jonestown footage is interesting, but almost a little uncomfortable. Good song, though. "You Know What I Mean" perfectly captures the 50s and 60s girl group sound and feel. Speaking of which, here is "He Did It," one of my favorite Ronettes songs. The band kicks so much ass, and has to in order to keep up with Ronnie Spector's absolute monster of a voice.






